Antagonize
Instant{1}{R}
Staple Rate
0.0%
Inclusions
9
Top Cut %
0.0%
TC Lift
0.48x
WR With
11.9%
WR Impact
-6.0pp
No role tags from the rule-based classifier (uncommon for cards with complex oracle text — curated tags coming in a later pass).
Recent adoption
| Window | Inclusions | Staple rate |
|---|---|---|
| 30d | 1 | 0.0% |
| 60d | 3 | 0.0% |
| 90d | 3 | 0.0% |
| All-time | 9 | 0.0% |
Why this matters
Grounded fit analysis for Fire Lord Azula
Top commanders running Antagonize
| Commander | Colors | Decks with card | Avg WR | Meta share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fire Lord Azula | 2 | 15.7% | 0.2% | |
| Zada, Hedron Grinder | 1 | 18.8% | 0.1% | |
| Vadrik, Astral Archmage | 1 | 25.8% | 0.0% | |
| Slicer, Hired Muscle // Slicer, High-Speed Antagonist | 1 | 12.1% | 0.1% | |
| Rionya, Fire Dancer | 1 | 18.3% | 0.0% | |
| Lathliss, Dragon Queen, Zada, Hedron Grinder | 1 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Krenko, Mob Boss | 1 | 14.9% | 0.1% | |
| Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar, Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh | 1 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Feather, the Redeemed | 1 | 5.0% | 0.0% |
69,133 decklists analyzed · View on Scryfall